Bonjour ou bonsoir (selon fuseau horaire), et merci.http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/324/7347/1195 :
BMJ 2002;324:1195-1199 ( 18 May ) Fredrick :
« People who wear spectacles for myopia may remember being told that they
would ruin their eyes if they read in the dark or in a moving car or
held the book too close to their faces (fig 2). The idea that the way in
which we use our eyes early in life can affect ocular growth and
refractive error is gaining scientific credence. »
Cependant, c'est la seule opinion en ce sens que j'ai trouvée, l'opinion
la plus répandue étant que la lecture dans l'obscurité procure au pire des
douleurs:
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/dec98/914284130.Me.r.html
http://www.netasia.net/users/truehealth/Eye%20Care%20Myths.htm
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=159098
Mais <news:6dbddb9.0404092048.69455320@posting.google.com>;:
<cit.>
It is not a good idea
to read in low levels of illumination.
The problem is that we pull the reading in much closer
if children read in poor light. And THAT is indeed
a problem -- but an indirect result of the illumination level.
Kids reading in deep dusk, with the eyes at 4 inches (-10 diopters)
hours at a time -- tend to develop a negative refractive status.
that environment has no effect on the refractive status
of the natural eye.]
</cit.>En fait, dans un sens comme dans l'autre, on trouve des arguments
d'autorité plutôt que des résultats d'études.
Envoyer ce sujet à un(e) ami(e)
Format d'impression
Mettre en signet (membres seulement)
Forum :
Recherche d'informations sur une maladie (Protected)
